The fishes are waiting for me to catch them... more


Thursday, 21 December 2017

Appeal to MOM



The IFM who was fired for outraging the modesty of a stewardess has approached MOM for assistance. The news is out and the decision is final. By accepting MOM's decision,
he cannot sue SIA for wrongful dismissal. Guess what's the decision? Keep your comments/guesses coming.

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

IFM re-instated with a demotion to LS?

Anonymous said...

MOM agreed with SIA 's earlier decision but only because SIA is government owned.

Anonymous said...

Kinder !So much ado about nothing.

Anonymous said...

received lump sum payment, case closed.

ghost of LKY said...

SQ policy does not waiver.
The highest level of inquiry is company level.
Decisions made at that level can not, will not be retracted.
( anyway, its just a wayang to demonstrate some protocol, decision
has already been made upon conclusion of investigation.Otherwise
it would not have proceeded.)

SQ very proud, confident, ( even arrogant ).. no earthquake, tsunami, typhoon
or even a crash will shake it.
Certainly not the union or an individual.Including a customer, LIFE or whatever.

The only person who can tickle it is now dead.

Anonymous said...

MOM will play the "neutral" and "safe" mode of resolving the issue. They will persuade both sides to agree on an agreed amount to part.

Anonymous said...

MOM will play the "neutral" and "safe" mode of resolving the issue. They will persuade both sides to agree on an agreed amount to part.

Anonymous said...

Seems like in Singapore,workers are powerless compared to employers with an ineffective union and NGO. The government and government linked companies are so powerful.

What did the union do for this steward? Tidur izzit?

Did they ensure he got a fair hearing?

All for snatching a pen, albeit from the woman's chest?

Anonymous said...

There was no wrongful or unlawful dismissal. A CI was held and it was concluded the bugger had indeed committed a crime. The bugger just wanna try hus luck and fight all the way. Nimpeh can bet 10k with anybody the result was still be the same- sacked

Anonymous said...

Just to reiterate the situation of the IFM predicament.The infraction is not a crime.Going straight when red is a traffic infrinment,made into Road Traffic Act,by passage of Constitution of State etc.But turning left on red is still wrong,unless it expressly says so.So it is made legal etc.Taking the pen to create a passageway on the throat of severly allergic patient could be explained either a medal or from the Kebaya a complaint,whichever is preferred is gone to CI.A trail in Civil Court could be settled by compensation for hurt feeling unintended because of Mens Rea,no determined acts to commmit the acts.At the same time a medal and gratefull compensation for saving the lives of choking pax.So depending on the composition of the Enquiry Board,a Unionist backed and Defender should be desirable.The 'bugger' is either a perpetrator or saviour a First Aider,should be addressed as.Whether he is trying his luck is debatable, if one is in his shoes with possible loss of income and lifestyle etc,his choice to go all the way.Now reduced to odds of bets and prospect of black X,mas,a normal Court will cross examine of Teaser aspect of the FSS,and whether the IFM had previous runs in with other FSS.Normally compensation amount is agreed.Frankly Limpeh think is disproportionate.At the end $$ because of $#x Case.Unless IFM is IFMSS or since turn Gay##,case dismissed!

Anonymous said...

Look here... very simple.

The love affair has ended.
when misbehaving employees get themselves
in shit...
Makes the task of reducing costs so much easier

F off and dont come back.
Oh, by the way, please sign the indemnity agreement.
Really, really dont want to see, hear from you again.

Of course you can buy tickets and fly with us.
Its just business.

Hahahahaha!

Anonymous said...

If the IFM's case is strong and backed with substantive evidence, nothing should prevent him from pursuing his appeal. Not sure if the Union is involved. On the other hand, he can scrap his appeal and seek justice in a court of law. Either way, this will be an uphill task.

Anonymous said...

Gathering evidence should be easy,whether its SOP to put pen in kebaya or elsewhere.If on helmline on the side ok ?Whether the FSS is of extreme size as it pertrude or undersize,whether the appearance is use as a defensive appeal for pax only and pax need to say whether it is appealing or disarming.Many a time,lowering the braline have been used to destablise naughty pax,shooting up their heartrate and eyes,suddenly complaints dissapear,its a war of the Sex.Game of Terok onboard,approve by the Ads and byline,slow mo etc.MP up north says in Parleyment its could hardly keep his eyes off the AirAisha and Manatahando Air.Too much overdone and obviously an occupationaly hazard in the least.If FSS does a Top up,case ends, intention to use Booby as weapons or unfair to guys got it flaunt it then complaint it ?Worse case scenarios,loser pays compensation but cannot be sack,how to pay ?Guys a victims in all case of such hormonal androgen surges.No end in sight ,maybe take pills to curb and awareness course.Suing the FSS should equalise the case away from the Co,and staying the CI.It takes courage but the publicity is something else,doubt the FSS could bear,could be an airport case and not true then,where got harassment when nothing substantial to boast ?