To those who nagged continuously about their unsubstantiated cons of being a cabin crew and attacked me under the cloak of anonymity, I challenge them to a debate with me via Zoom. Come into the open and show us who you are or else shut up and stop nagging!
6 comments:
Hi, BT, if I may, I would like to share my views. Although you might disagree and won't post my comments, here goes nonethless.
I am of the humble opinion that the challenge was not a good idea for the following reasons:-
1. You cannot take criticism and give an impression that you are an opinionated person, even if you might not be so.
2. The challenge can be confrontational. Hence, what if the invitee ACCEPT your challenge and the debate gets "too hot"? I am not suggesting that you cannot control the situation and will lose your cool but, in a heated-up situation, anything can happen. In a bad scenario, both of you start to quarrel and it will get nowhere. In a best case scenario, you remain calm and decline further argument, and the debate goes nowhere too.
3. The invitee does DOES NOT ACCEPT your challenge. What next? You wait and hope for him to accept whilst he smirk at the backend, knowing that he had succeeded in getting on your nerve.
Given the above, wouldn't it be better if it just remain status quo? I am sure your readers can tell the merits, or otherwise, of each post. Or, as the blog administrator, you block irrelevant posts.
My views.
Just block irrelevant post and those that r personal in nature and u will succeed in getting rid of trolls.
Strange enough, blocking, it has the desired effect of making trolls frustrated because they can't get their points across for others to read.
If u don't do this blocking, it will result in your blog going to square one again with no good commenter coming in to comment but those 3 trolls with their coffee and tea nonsense.
Your best move is to block and discard their contents.
Then u r in a situation of Winner takes it all, hehe by Abba. Lol.
Well said [KayPoh aka Busybody].
Precisely my sentiments. And you cannot change ppl's views by enforcing yours on them thru a f2f session. It's super unwise.
Don't make the fatal mistake of not censoring. Why do u think Singapore is also into censoring? Very simple. Censoring frustrates the trolls and those that cannot reason with justification and on rational basis.
They simply don't have the capacity to post rational comments. Strange, but it does..... how come ah... cannot debate intelligently.
Write nonsense all the time.
The anonymous above me has been voted as The Best Answer. Yes censorship is important or else people might be misinformed.
Yes Luke, go for it. Those that come up with Stinkaporean for example should be booted out, otherwise such commenter will only create havoc to your blog and the end result will be less and fewer viewers coming into your blog bec they get sick of the nonsensical comments that don't add value to your blog. We will be wasting our time clicking on a topic comment section isn't it if u get no intelligent comments coming thru? And in no time the popularity of your blog will wain. So censorship is critical bec there are people who don't have the capacity to post rationale comments to the topic. IQ problem?
Post a Comment