This is a Singapore Airline (SIA) blog . The stories are written by an ex cabin crew. The stories are about the crew of SIA, especially concerning cabin crew and pilots.
Tuesday, April 22, 2025
2 blur sotongs and a "stupid" steward
8 comments:
Anonymous
said...
B,T.You can join in the fray of election in Sin.Also some media report says Sq 321 pilot erred by flying into the storm over Myanmar and Thailand when other airlines avoided.Your comments ?
For 👁️ eye ball lah, Influencer use current interest to get in the groove.Try it ,it's free and Google around for the SQ fly into storm when other avoid. I have done the research,fyi.
The main crux is the pilot flew into the storm,which ,2 other planes avoid.They did not got hit at all. So it means wrong move by SQ 321 pilot.Different is no hit and dropped by plane.
But when paxs injured,it news worthy,and get sued.If SQ321 flew into storm, could be more liability and compensation expected.Their lawyers can say why they escaped injuries ?Just watch lah, expect more update on claims, don't think it will go away.
They did not fly in together. Wind strength and wind directions etc change every second. The planes are kilometers apart or in height. Hence you cant compare like this. You cant say 10 flew in, 9 never kena but only 1 kena so its the driver fault.
The facts reported as ,3 planes in the areas ,noted on radar.Two avoid and sq321 headed straight for the storm .Casualties resulted .It was not said say "10 flew in, 9 never kena but only 1 kena s", the victims lawyer got a lot of data of the incident.If they are proven right,the paxs can claim and much more .We could only awaits the discovery and further update,in future.
8 comments:
B,T.You can join in the fray of election in Sin.Also some media report says Sq 321 pilot erred by flying into the storm over Myanmar and Thailand when other airlines avoided.Your comments ?
Me not interested in politics la. As for SQ 321, I have not heard anything about it.
For 👁️ eye ball lah, Influencer use current interest to get in the groove.Try it ,it's free and Google around for the SQ fly into storm when other avoid. I have done the research,fyi.
The last time it flew into the storm was in 2024 (old news la)
The main crux is the pilot flew into the storm,which ,2 other planes avoid.They did not got hit at all. So it means wrong move by SQ 321 pilot.Different is no hit and dropped by plane.
But when paxs injured,it news worthy,and get sued.If SQ321 flew into storm, could be more liability and compensation expected.Their lawyers can say why they escaped injuries ?Just watch lah, expect more update on claims, don't think it will go away.
They did not fly in together. Wind strength and wind directions etc change every second. The planes are kilometers apart or in height. Hence you cant compare like this. You cant say 10 flew in, 9 never kena but only 1 kena so its the driver fault.
The facts reported as ,3 planes in the areas ,noted on radar.Two avoid and sq321 headed straight for the storm .Casualties resulted .It was not said say "10 flew in, 9 never kena but only 1 kena s", the victims lawyer got a lot of data of the incident.If they are proven right,the paxs can claim and much more .We could only awaits the discovery and further update,in future.
Post a Comment